?

Log in

recursion's Journal

> recent entries
> calendar
> friends
> profile
> previous 20 entries

Tuesday, October 2nd, 2007
3:02 pm - True or False

neitherday
One of the keys to understanding the nature of things is to let go of the dichotomy of true and false. Just because something is a lie or is false does not make it any less true. Just because something is the truth does not make it any less a lie. That which has never been has always existed. Paradoxes are not paradoxes when one sees that truths can contradict each other because they are also lies.

current mood: full

(think)

Saturday, April 28th, 2007
5:24 pm - Reality Hacking with Quantum Immortality

neitherday
I've been thinking about quantum immortality and how, if true, it could be used to manipulate one's experienced universe. For example, entity X cannot live without entity Y, so entity X creates a device that will insure their death if entity Y should die. From entity X's point of view, no outcome where entity X themselves die can occur -- as a result entity Y will never die in entity X's experienced universe.

With such trigger devices it would be able to manipulate an experienced universe to the desires of the experience. The trigger devises would have to be infallible, and that is quite a large hurdle to clear for any wholesale manipulation. Imperfect, though perhaps satisfactory, results might be found if the trigger device is significantly less probable to fail than the desired event is to not happen. Of course if the quantum immortality hypothesis is incorrect, the trigger devices will simply kill the user.

current mood: awake

(1 thought | think)

Thursday, March 15th, 2007
3:22 pm - Absolute Truth

neitherday
There is only one absolute truth, and that is "There is only one absolute truth."

current mood: hungry

(think)

Friday, March 10th, 2006
1:00 pm - New Community

neitherday
geek: (n) a person who is fascinated, perhaps obsessively, by obscure or very specific areas of knowledge and imagination.

nerd: (n) a person who is perceived to be of above-average intelligence and whose interests are not shared by mainstream society.

icon_geekery: (n) a place for geeks and nerds to find and/or post geeky and nerdy icons.

current mood: mellow

(think)

Thursday, December 29th, 2005
7:34 pm - 2055

neitherday
I will only make one prediction about what the world will be like in 50 years: it will not be like anyone predicts.

current mood: melancholy

(2 thoughts | think)

Friday, December 16th, 2005
9:36 pm - Anywho...

ambilevous
I'm the new maintainer of this community.

Continue as you were.

Or indeed continue moreso.

Or however you see fit, really.

Then go here.

(1 thought | think)

Monday, December 12th, 2005
11:23 am - New Maintainer Wanted

neitherday
I have decided to hand over maintainership of this community to someone else. If you are interested in running this community, please reply to this post.

current mood: blank

(4 thoughts | think)

Sunday, October 30th, 2005
11:36 pm - Fine tuning leads to radio silence

tergum
I think I have a fundamental grasp on zen, and also on the loss of ones ego.
Nothing is important, least of all myself, but least of all to myself, I am important.
I am rather cut off from myself. I'm not sure whether its a flaw or a virtue.
And of course, since I am so unimportant, it is only reasonable that I have a livejournal so as to bitch about my problems. It is also reasonable that you each pay me 10 shiny new pesos, and elect me as emperor. Just hurry up people, my worthless time is wasting.

(1 thought | think)

Sunday, October 9th, 2005
8:33 pm - Icons of the Mad

neitherday
spiralicons is a new community is for mentally ill LiveJournal denizens to find icons and to display icons that they have made relating to mental illness. All aspects of mental illness are relevant. We speak madness here. Run by the same person who brought you recursion.

current mood: happy

(1 thought | think)

Friday, September 23rd, 2005
9:33 am - The Onion always cheers me up.

tergum
Study: Majority Of Americans Out Of Touch With Mainstream

July 21, 2004 | Issue 40•29

NEW YORK—According to a study published by the Popular Culture Research Group Monday, the majority of American citizens are out of touch with mainstream American society.

"We're not sure, at this point, whether this is a new trend or a continuation of an old trend," PCRG consultant Paul Van Lamm said. "All we know right now is that 70 to 85 percent of Americans are unfamiliar with, unaware of, or just plain don't care about what the American people are watching on television, seeing at the movie theater, listening to on their radios, wearing, rooting for, falling in love with all over again, or downloading."

According to Van Lamm, 71 percent of U.S. citizens polled had no interest in NASCAR racing, America's fastest-growing sport. Van Lamm added that 69 percent of poll respondents said they did not have a single Hispanic friend, in spite of the fact that Hispanics are the nation's fastest-growing minority group. Additionally, the majority of poll respondents did not see the final episode of Friends, television's most-watched sitcom.

"It's disturbing," Van Lamm said. "I'm uncomfortable with the number of U.S. citizens who have no interest in what interests the greater part of their fellow citizens."

[CAPTION]
A scene from NBC's Will & Grace, a TV show about which many Americans care surprisingly little.

Additional data collected by prominent forecasters, pollsters, and trend-watchers indicates that an overwhelming number of Americans have not seen this week's box-office smashes; do not own a Munsingwear penguin-logo golf shirt, the country's hottest fashion item; and not only do not own the must-have Apple iPod, but have never even participated in the runaway fad of downloading the nation's top albums, many of which they've never heard.

Interviews with average Americans seem to support such findings.

"Kanye West? He's in one of those shows. Or was in. It's off the air now, is that it?" said Pewaukee, WI resident and HVAC technician Carl Danford. "Huh... DaVinci Code, you say. I know: Is it a movie? What's Nordic Walking? I mean 'who.' Who is Nordic Walking?"

"I know The White Stripes is a band that younger people like," Danford added.

When asked to name the latest and most buzzworthy figures in entertainment, Tempe, AZ daycare provider Tina Jefferson said, "A lot of the children here saw the Harry Potter movie. And Yao Ming plays sports. How is that?"

"Oh, wait!" Jefferson added. "I know that Anna Nicole Smith lost a lot of weight and people are talking about it. Well, not me or people I know, but other people."

Carson Mannheim, lead statistician and founder of Mannheim Media Research, said he is trying to make sense of the confusing data.

"We're unsure exactly what these figures may mean, but the implications must be far-reaching," Mannheim said. "We're used to Americans not knowing the capital of the next state over, or who their congressman is, or how a bill becomes a law. But the idea that most residents of this country don't know anything about 'Fit But You Know It,' Usher, Dragonball Z, or the WWE is terrifying. No one seems to care that these are the things that influence the everyday life of most Americans."

(think)

Monday, August 8th, 2005
6:49 pm - Recursive directories

gmalivuk
Something tells me this shouldn't be a valid directory on any computer:

H:\Private\MATHLAB\Desktop\IFS Home\Private\MATHLAB\Desktop\IFS Home\Private\MATHLAB\Desktop\IFS Home\Private\MATHLAB\Desktop\IFS Home\Private\MATHLAB\Desktop\IFS Home\Private\MATHLAB\Desktop\IFS Home\Private\...

(As far as I can tell, it can just keep going.)

(4 thoughts | think)

Friday, July 8th, 2005
3:07 pm

tergum
Open all doorways and follow me through the halls of dementia, where you can find a reason without reasonability, and follow a dream from point A to point B without ever passing through the long middle. We can all find a point without a place, and live their throughout our long happy lives until only the maggots delight in our hollow company. We are the brotherhood without arms, reaching out to each other in the long dusty night.
...But I would much rather sit down and put on a party hat.
Would anybody like some candy?

current mood: Restless

(3 thoughts | think)

Saturday, March 27th, 2004
8:52 pm - Apologies if this is old hat, but:

electricwalrus
To understand recursion, you must first understand recursion-1.

(4 thoughts | think)

Wednesday, March 3rd, 2004
5:08 pm - Recursive phrase structure rules

gmalivuk
I don't know where I heard it, but I think I remember someone on Livejournal once saying that, chances are, any sentence you make with simple words that have existed for awhile is going to express the same meaning as some sentence previously uttered in the history of mankind. After all, we've had language for something like 100,000 years, and that's a lot of talking. Most senseful combinations of simple concepts have probably been covered.

Obviously this statement is bullshit, though, because it was made with no restriction on the length of a sentence. There are a couple very simple phrase structure rules in English that are recursive and thus allow for infinitely long sentences. Take, for instance, the following rules:

Sentence -> Noun + Verb (Phrase)
Verb Phrase -> Verb + Sentence

And combine them with the following words:

knew - verb
he - noun
I - noun

You can keep adding a level on top to get an infinite sequence:

I knew.
He knew [I knew].
I knew [he knew [I knew]].
He knew [I knew [he knew [I knew]]].
.
.
.

And even though an infinitely long sentence cannot have sensible meaning in English, a sentence of the above form of any arbitrarily large (even) number of words can be unraveled, complex as it may be. So to make absolutely sure you're uttering something never said before, simply count up the number of words ever spoken in human history, and apply the pair of recursive rules that many times, and you'll get a sentence with twice as many words as have been cumulatively spoken in the past 100,000 years, so obviously that sentence has never been uttered before.


What I want to know is if there are any languages with complex enough word-formation rules to allow for a *meaningful* single word longer than any arbitary number of syllables...

(9 thoughts | think)

Wednesday, October 29th, 2003
9:16 pm - Thinking Thoughts

neitherday
you can feel thought. thought is all around you. that's what you're touching. the universe is made up of thoughts. you are thinking this whole thing up right now. if it weren't for you having thoughts you wouldn't be reading this thought. you parse this thought. you consider it's meanings and therefore you are thinking this thought.

current mood: high

(think)

Saturday, October 25th, 2003
1:29 am

teamnoir
ontology

That's recursion for ya. I'm roflmao about that one.

(think)

Friday, October 24th, 2003
1:37 am - How about that recursion?

teamnoir
Sure. I'll talk about something. Despite being either not here or not a person.

I've been looking for real world examples of recursion. Not code, not contrived examples, not simple circular definitions, but naturally occurring instances of recursion that might be used to explain recursion by example.

Anyone, (or no one), got any, (or none)?

(8 thoughts | think)

8:49 pm - So let me get this straight..

ambilevous
There are people here, who say there are no people here; despite the fact that there must be people here, otherwise there would be no people here to say there are no people here.

Which really begs the question.. are the people who claim they aren't here, but seem to be here to say they aren't here; interested in talking about anything aside from them not being here (which they aren't; otherwise they wouldn't be talking about not being here)?

(18 thoughts | think)

Thursday, October 23rd, 2003
10:32 am - *tappity-tappity-tap*

ambilevous
Is there anybody out there?

(20 thoughts | think)

Saturday, September 6th, 2003
3:59 pm - Word salad?

teamnoir
Is word salad welcome here?

While not exactly logical rollercoasters, it's damned close. More like logical whippets, I'd think.

(3 thoughts | think)

> previous 20 entries
> top of page
LiveJournal.com